Pasadena Convention Center - Exhibit Halls A & B - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% | |
| 2 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 3 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% | |
| 3 | LIN Xilong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% | |
| 5 | LIN Youlong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% |
| 6 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | |
| 7 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
| 8 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 9 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 15% |
| 10 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 11 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 13% | |
| 12 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 13 | RENTERIA Emiliano | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 14 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 6% | |
| 15 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 8% |
| 16 | PONS Diego | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
| 18 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 19 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 18% | |
| 20 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
| 24 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 25 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 26 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 28 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 29 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | CAJERO Luis | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
| 37 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 73% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 99% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | BARTSCH Henry | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ANWEILER Nathan | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | KUO Jayden | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 45 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | PARK David | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | UPENDER West | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 50 | PERALTA RODRIGUEZ Niko | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | CHIN MinSeop | 100% | 100% | 91% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 52 | YORK Lucas | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | FOY Grant | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | DACKO Nolan | 100% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | RODRIGUEZ Alejandro | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 58 | WANG Matthew | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.