Pasadena Convention Center - Exhibit Halls A & B - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | - | - | 4% | 96% |
| 2 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 3 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% | |
| 3 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
| 5 | ANDONIAN Lauren | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 12% | |
| 6 | WYNN Kylie | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 7 | ZEE Savannah | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Ivy | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 9 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 77% |
| 10 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 9% | 44% | 46% | |
| 11 | RUI Jessie | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | KIM Sydney | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 13 | YAO abby | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 1% |
| 15 | LIU Samantha | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | ZHOU Joi | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% | |
| 17 | YU Sophie | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | PEDERSEN Haley | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 19 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | 2% | 19% | 52% | 27% | |
| 20 | CHOI Sophie | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 27% | 2% | |
| 21 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | CUI alivia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 45% | 7% |
| 23 | LUCAS Ava | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 24 | LIU Ashley | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 25 | LI Joy | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 26 | LIM Kensie | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | HUGHES Olivia | - | 3% | 20% | 51% | 23% | 3% | |
| 28 | PARK Lauren | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 4% |
| 29 | VILLARAMA Kara | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 31 | HSIAO Ariya | 14% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | LIU Ariana | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% | |
| 34 | FANG Kelervia | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
| 35 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | - | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 36 | XIA Isabella | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | LIN Allison | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | SEAL Ayda | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ZHANG Queeny | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | - |
| 40 | SOE Hayleigh | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | MA Yiming (Emily) | 7% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | WANG Doreen | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 1% | |
| 43 | CHEN Madeleine | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | TAN Shouyin | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | FAN Sophia | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 46 | WANG Ellen | 22% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | CHANG Olivia | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KIM Natalie | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | WANG Yanxuan (Alicia) | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | CHEN Chelsea | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | TANG Amelia | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | CHU Felicity | 4% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | KULKARNI myra | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | XI Sophia | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | NGUYEN Chloe | 5% | 31% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | MANANSALA Zara | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | ZOU JIAYING | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | BUI Aubrie | 57% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | YU Xintong | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | AHN Hayley | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | RIGBY Ellie | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | BENNYHOFF Naia | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | TAI Taphanie | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 64 | VIERTEL Etta | 74% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.