Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | CANNON Caiden C. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
2 | ANDERSON Colton J. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 49% | 25% |
3 | YI Stephen K. | - | - | 4% | 34% | 48% | 13% |
3 | SEZER Kaya | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 31% |
5 | NOWAK Joseph A. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
6 | NEWHARD Noah A. | - | 1% | 9% | 44% | 39% | 8% |
7 | NOVACHENKO Nestor V. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
8 | ANDERSON David C. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
9 | ROMANOV Michael | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 40% |
10 | LIU Jonathan C. | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 54% |
11 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
12 | SINHA Verdhaan | 4% | 39% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - |
13 | LEE Connor C. | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% |
14 | RYAN Francis D. | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
15 | WITTENBERG Jackson H. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 1% |
16 | LI Simon A. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
17 | WANG Duke R. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
18 | GLOVER James | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - |
19 | WATT Xander | 20% | 47% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
20 | CONWAY Brett | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
21 | VAN BUREN Brett J. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
22 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
23 | CALDARARU Sorin | 9% | 46% | 39% | 6% | - | - |
24 | JUSCINSKI MIchal | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
25 | LIU Jacob B. | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
26 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
27 | JI Aidan Y. | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
28 | DRIVER Samuel | 38% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
29 | MADRY Josh | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | CHEN Yucheng | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.