Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHAWLA Armaan | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | ANAFI Ari | V V V V V | V V V V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 3 | LEE Aiden | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | TATE William Isom | V V V D D | V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 5 | HU Robert J. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 7 | GAMBINO Robert A. | V D D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 8 | CHAWLA Aarav | D D V D V | V V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 9 | SNYDER IV William B. | V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | KWOUN Miles S. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | SEIKEL Spencer | V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | CONVERSE Warren D. | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 13 | TIRRELL Justin J. | D D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 14 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 15 | BANNEN Nicholas | V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | ASUNCION Arren | D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 17 | PETROW Zoryan | D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 18 | HUTZ Michael B. | V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 19 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 20 | YI Nathan | D V V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 21 | FAKTOR Emily | V V V D D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 22 | STAFFORD Neti | V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 23 | WANG Kobe | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 24 | MARTINEZ Joshua | V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 25 | BOWIE Charlotta | D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 25 | MURPHY Megan | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | PFEIL Shawn | D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 28 | ABRAMOV Alexander | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 29 | SOKALSKI Edwin | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | BJERKNESS Riley | D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | KAPLAN Maddox | D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 32 | KARASICK Andrew | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | LIU Sydney | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 34 | SIMS Martin L. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 34 | HOOVER Natalie | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 36 | CHEN Shanshan | D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.