Walter E Washington Convention Center - Washington D.C, DC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% |
2 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
3 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% | |
3 | WANG SIQI | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
5 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
6 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
7 | XIE Lillian | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
8 | OH Ceana | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
9 | SHENG Chuxi | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
10 | YANG Audrey | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
11 | SHIM Grace J. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
12 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
13 | YAO Ada | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
14 | ZOU Ella | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
15 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
16 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
17 | WANG CAROL | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
18 | BAE Yooju | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
19 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
20 | FIELD Julianna | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
21 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
22 | DENG Melissa | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% | |
23 | CHANG Elizabeth | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
24 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
25 | WANG Sophia | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
26 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
27 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | - | 4% | 26% | 45% | 22% | 2% |
28 | SHEN Emilia | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% | |
29 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
30 | LI Eleanor | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
31 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
32 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
33 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 45% | 11% |
34 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
34 | GE Yu Ming | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
36 | LAI Sophia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
37 | CAMPBELL June | 6% | 47% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
38 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
38 | FENG Audrey | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
40 | JOO Natalie | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
41 | GUO Audrey | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
42 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | 7% | 30% | 47% | 16% | |
43 | DONG Angela | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 6% | - |
44 | DAVIS Logan | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
45 | ZHANG Selena | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
46 | BROWN Lola | - | 8% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 1% | |
47 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
48 | WANG Jasmine | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
49 | WANG Amabel | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
50 | BING Charlotte | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
50 | HAO Danica | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
52 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
53 | CAO Kayla | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
54 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
55 | BERGEL Daphne | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
56 | CHEN Sophie | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
57 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
58 | ZELDIN Nadia | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
59 | FIELD Elizabeth | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
60 | BASILE Gianna | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
61 | KIM Claire | 36% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
62 | SHMUKLER Maria | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
63 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
64 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
65 | LEE emily | - | 11% | 40% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
66 | WANG Joanna | 1% | 8% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
67 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | 1% | 18% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
68 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 19% | 49% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
69 | OWENS Elise | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
70 | JIANG Chloe | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
71 | YU Jane | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
72 | LI Katerina | 34% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
72 | COLLINS Anna | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
74 | BADLANI Diya | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
75 | GE Lena Lan | 16% | 54% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
76 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
77 | WANG Melissa | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
78 | KATS Ekaterina | 52% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
79 | LEE Allison | 79% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
80 | ZHOU Sophia | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
81 | SELSER Ella | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
82 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.