Fortune Fencing SYC /RJCC & Y8

Y-14 Men's Saber

Friday, March 22, 2024 at 12:00 PM

Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HWANG Jayden - - - - 3% 27% 69%
2 KOVALEV Daniil N. - - - - 3% 27% 70%
3 ANDRES Michael - - - - 7% 37% 56%
3 TANI Tino - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
5 WONG Lucas - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 15%
6 CAO Oliver - 1% 6% 25% 44% 24%
6 XIAO Brayden 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
8 SANCHEZ Jacob - - 1% 9% 33% 47% 10%
9 LI AYDEN - - 3% 12% 30% 37% 17%
10 NGO Maximus - - - 1% 10% 38% 50%
11 YANG Phillip - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 19%
12 ZENG Vito - 1% 9% 31% 41% 18%
13 IM Tyler - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
14 HWANG Hagan - 1% 5% 17% 34% 32% 11%
15 HOLZ Lucas - 1% 6% 20% 35% 29% 9%
16 VENKATRAMAN Sudhir 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
17 GRIGORIEV Roman - 2% 12% 30% 35% 18% 3%
18 CHAN Henry - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 19%
19 LUC Cedric - 1% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
20 KANG Jeremy - 1% 7% 27% 43% 22%
21 GREMILLION Obadiah - 1% 7% 22% 34% 27% 8%
22 WONG David 3% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
23 ARISTOV Ilya - - 1% 6% 30% 48% 15%
24 BRIMMER Robert (Trey) - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
25 IYER Neil 1% 7% 24% 37% 26% 6%
26 KOVACHEV Martin 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 2%
27 BAI Evan - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
28 KANG Matthew - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
29 LI Yidong A. 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
30 RONG Jasper - 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 5%
31 GREENSTEIN Viktor - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 15%
32 LEE Nathan Uju - 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 5%
33 KROON Landon - - 1% 9% 35% 46% 9%
33 GU Andrew - - 5% 24% 46% 22% 3%
35 YU Casey 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
36 WONG Ron - 6% 29% 40% 21% 4%
37 LEE Brian - 5% 26% 39% 24% 6% -
38 WANG Edward 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
39 MINASIAN Mason - 4% 22% 39% 27% 8% 1%
40 NGO Emerson - 1% 7% 27% 44% 19% 2%
41 OU Rigel 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 8% 1%
41 WONG Hawken - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 6%
43 VO Landon 3% 15% 32% 32% 16% 3%
44 YUEN Caleb 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
45 GONZALEZ Mark 3% 20% 38% 30% 8% 1% -
46 VO Blake 7% 26% 35% 23% 8% 1% -
47 LIU Yijin 1% 7% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1%
48 WANG Tiger - 4% 15% 31% 32% 15% 3%
49 HE Zhikai (kyle) 1% 6% 23% 39% 26% 5% -
50 NGUYEN Ethan 14% 39% 35% 11% 1% - -
51 BEKDJANOV Arthur - 3% 22% 40% 28% 6%
52 ANUMULA Aryan 1% 11% 33% 37% 16% 2%
53 LI Ryan 12% 33% 35% 17% 4% -
54 LUC Linkin 5% 21% 36% 28% 10% 1%
55 SU Kingston 13% 34% 33% 16% 4% -
56 BAERENWALD Tybalt Wolfram 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1%
57 SHA Walter - 1% 12% 32% 37% 16% 2%
58 PIMENTEL Diego 5% 35% 38% 17% 4% - -
59 PHAN Joshua 1% 11% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
60 WANG Yongen - 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
61 CHANG Daniel 3% 16% 32% 30% 15% 3% -
62 CHI Everett 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4%
63 BRUM Charles E. 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
64 BROOKS Theo 20% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
65 FU BRANDEN 1% 7% 24% 38% 25% 5% -
66 WINTERSET Mason 1% 17% 39% 32% 10% 1%
66 BROWN Andrew 3% 27% 41% 23% 5% -
68 EZZELL Alexander 6% 23% 34% 25% 9% 2% -
69 OLSON Kai 1% 10% 31% 40% 16% 2% -
70 MOORE Greyson 6% 27% 38% 22% 6% - -
71 VAN ROY Ray 15% 39% 32% 12% 2% - -
72 TANG Morgan - 1% 7% 21% 34% 28% 9%
73 LEE Brendan 2% 12% 28% 33% 19% 6% 1%
74 KIM Suin 5% 26% 39% 23% 6% - -
75 LIU Daniel 29% 42% 22% 5% 1% -
76 OLSEN Dane 19% 52% 25% 5% - -
77 HERRERA Stefano 6% 46% 36% 11% 1% - -
78 BRADIC Andreja 9% 34% 38% 16% 2% - -
79 LIANG Preston 20% 38% 29% 11% 2% - -
79 ZHAO Aidan 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
81 VENKATRAMAN Sushil 3% 20% 39% 29% 8% 1% -
81 WALKER Camden 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
83 IRVINE Patrick 27% 44% 24% 5% - - -
84 WANG Alex 1% 8% 23% 33% 25% 9% 1%
85 CHEN Shawn 10% 33% 36% 17% 4% -
86 BROOKS Isaac 9% 34% 39% 16% 2% - -
87 CHAN Troy 68% 27% 4% - - -
88 WARD Carter 36% 42% 18% 3% - - -
89 TYAGI Atticus 59% 36% 5% - - -
90 QI Jeremy 13% 33% 33% 16% 4% 1% -
90 YAO Kellon(Yukun) 31% 43% 21% 4% - - -
92 YU Joshua 71% 25% 3% - - - -
93 COOK Ridgely 80% 19% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.