Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JIANG Evelyn | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 2 | OCA Merci | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
| 3 | KIM Satie | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 5 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 42% | |
| 6 | ZHU Elaine | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 7 | STONE Coral | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 8 | CONG Anne | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 9 | KU Alathea-Joy | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 10 | YUEN Nicole | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 11 | HAN Emma | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | KINKADE Ellie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 13 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 14 | MAO Elsa | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 15 | TONG Laurie | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 16 | MISHEV Lila | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 18 | SHEARER Alena | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 18 | CHEN Elaine | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 20 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 21 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 22 | BORDAS HILL Georgiana | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 23 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | WONG Cerise | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | PHAN Genevieve | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 26 | KANG Ellie | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 14% |
| 27 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 3% | 20% | 50% | 27% | |
| 28 | TURIANO Nadelle | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | BORTAI Eliza | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | NING Lynn | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | WANG Jiayi | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 32 | PATIL Jyothi | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | MAO anna | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SUNG Isabella | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | WONG Natalie | - | 8% | 35% | 42% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | LONG Jessie | 1% | 14% | 43% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 37 | CAO arissa | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | SENGUPTA Jia | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | YAN Angela | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | CHEN Colette | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 41 | LIU Hannah | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 42 | LIU kai yin aria | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | CAI Veronica | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | ASPIRAS Avery | 10% | 49% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | YU Skylar | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 46 | HENRY Erin | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | PANCHAL Arya | 35% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | YU Stella | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | LEE Madeleine | 31% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | QIN Ningnie | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 51 | JUNG Sienna | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | XU Rachel | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | KIRBY Skye | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | STAPLEY Claire | 15% | 50% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 55 | WALLIS Allie | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.