Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | QI Julieanne | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 2 | MEYER Rachel | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 3 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 3 | LI Caroline | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 5 | BRAGG Leah | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 6 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 7 | CHEN Alina | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 8 | WEI Sherry | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 9 | KAUR Manroop | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 26% | 4% | |
| 10 | BI Michelle | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 11 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 12 | YU Eva | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | MEYER Rebecca | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | CHI Sarah | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | HOAGLAND Sally | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 16 | WU Madisen | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | YAO Chloe | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 18 | WONG Angelina | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | MIN Melinda | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 20 | BAWA Jenya | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | FANG Jocelyn | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 22 | WANG Chloe | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | HAN Yuchen | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% | |
| 24 | TRAN Katherine | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 25 | JUN Bomie | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | TRIEU Autumn | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 27 | WONG Caitlin | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 28 | HU Chloe | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | WROBEL Julia | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 30 | LIN Cynthia | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ZHANG Jane | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | CHANG Cadence | 40% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | ZHENG Erin | 6% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | HALL Henrietta | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | LEE Claudia | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | KWON Elise | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 37 | FANG jenna kim | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | MATHEW Noe | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | LEUNG Sydney | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | XU Hua | 27% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | NGUYEN Celena | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 42 | YU Sara | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | GARCIA Daniela | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 44 | LIN Chloe | 2% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.