Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Eva | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 39% | 7% | |
| 2 | SEIDL Cassidy M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 3 | MING YUE | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
| 3 | GE Yu Ming | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 5 | GREEN Marisa | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 6 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 7 | SAKALLA Serene | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | HUANG Sophie | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 9 | CHENG Isa | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
| 10 | LI Katerina | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | TURNER Stephanie E. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
| 12 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% |
| 13 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 13% |
| 14 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 1% | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 15 | DIPAOLO Julia | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | LIU Caydence | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | WANG Chloe | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 18 | MEYER Claudia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 23% | 3% |
| 19 | WEI Angela | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% |
| 20 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 3% | 27% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 21 | KIM Claire | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 22 | FENG Audrey | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 23 | BASILE Gianna | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 24 | LAZAR Carolina | 5% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | OLSEN Jen | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 26 | CHARALEL Jessica | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 27 | WANG Yudi | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 28 | HWANG Chanel | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LENZ Zoe N. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 30 | FONG Ellis | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ANAR Yesugen | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | LAO Sophia | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 4% |
| 33 | CHEN Colyi | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | SHAH Suhani | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | WANG Melissa | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | CHEN Sophie | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 38 | SNYDERS Evelyn | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 39 | COMO Gabriella | 21% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | TSE Isabel | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LEE Allison | 22% | 52% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 1% | 13% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LIU Long | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 44 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 29% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 45 | WU Kristen | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | WANG Annie | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 47 | DALBERG Meadow | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 48 | CHOI ERIN | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ANAR Yesui | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | WANG Yilin | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | NETTLETON Ava | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | FANG Adela | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | PARK-YOO Shia | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.