Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
2 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
3 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 47% |
3 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
5 | PROFIS Liora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
6 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
7 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
8 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
9 | KHARCHYNA Polina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% |
10 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
11 | BUECHEL Holly M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
12 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
13 | WANG Trinity | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
14 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 7% |
15 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% |
16 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
17 | CHOY LeeAnn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 34% |
18 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
19 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
20 | CAI Yiyi (Phoebe) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
21 | GAO Judy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
22 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
23 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | 2% |
24 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
25 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% |
26 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
27 | LI Fei | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
28 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
29 | WANG Sophie Y. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
30 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
31 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
32 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
33 | SMOTRITSKY Liat | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | < 1% | |
34 | DAVIS Jessica L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% |
35 | XIAO Nancy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
36 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
37 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 16% |
38 | HUREL Bertille | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
39 | WESER Veronica U. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
40 | LURYE Lina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
41 | WANG Yumin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
42 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 4% | - |
43 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
44 | AZMEH Nour | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
45 | LI Olivia | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
46 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - |
47 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
48 | CAVNAR Peyton | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
49 | CASHMAN Amanda | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
50 | WONG Caitlin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
51 | HAN Claire | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
52 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
53 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
54 | TRAN Helena | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
55 | POLANICHKA Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 8% |
56 | FENG Iris | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
57 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
58 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
59 | DAGLI Saira Veronica | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
60 | CHEN Jingyun | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
60 | COLELLA Lauren | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
62 | CHANG Chloe | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
63 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
64 | CHEN Alicia | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
65 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
66 | FAN Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
67 | UNGURIANU Nika | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - |
68 | MCSWEENEY Janie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
69 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
70 | BI Michelle | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
71 | MIN Melinda | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
72 | BISEN Shivani S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
73 | YU Eva | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
74 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
75 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
76 | ZHANG ANGELA | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
77 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
77 | ELKHATEEB Fajr | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
79 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
80 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
81 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
82 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
82 | WROBEL Julia | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
84 | TOLLEY Toby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
85 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
86 | FOMINA Polina | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
87 | DUNNE Jessica | 100% | 75% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
88 | WUNDERLICH Cara J. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
88 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
90 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.