Carrollton, TX - Carrollton, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | JEAN Noe T. | - | - | 5% | 28% | 47% | 19% |
| 2 | ESCUETA Tony V. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 3 | DESAI Drewv D. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 30% |
| 3 | GREEN IV James (Bud) | - | - | - | 11% | 44% | 45% |
| 5 | CHEONG Heonjae | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% | |
| 6 | BANNERMAN Andrew J. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 7 | CHON Taylor A. | - | 2% | 22% | 46% | 26% | 4% |
| 8 | HWANG Ryan C. | 2% | 18% | 43% | 30% | 6% | |
| 9 | MENTA Varun | - | - | 4% | 48% | 40% | 8% |
| 10 | BRAR Sanjeet | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 11 | MAGUIRE Matthew V. | - | - | 4% | 27% | 46% | 23% |
| 12 | BONSELL Vance | - | 10% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 14 | CHEN Christopher | 1% | 8% | 33% | 43% | 16% | |
| 15 | CONINE Tanner C. | - | 6% | 41% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 16 | KIM Alexander M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 17 | JUNG Junhwan | - | - | 2% | 24% | 52% | 23% |
| 18 | CADAMBE Rishi | 10% | 42% | 43% | 5% | - | - |
| 19 | YANG Ethan | - | 2% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 7% |
| 20 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 9% | 42% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | KOSURI Harsha | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | ZHU Charlie | 20% | 58% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | POLSER John | 25% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | NGUYEN Andrew | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 25 | XU Adler | 34% | 48% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | YE Joshua | 66% | 33% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 27 | LI Matthew | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 28 | BOWMAN James | 65% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | BYBEE Matthew | 29% | 52% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.