Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NATH Trisha | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 2 | DAI Olivia | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
| 3 | LUKER Sophia | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 3 | TENG EMMA | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 5 | KHAN Alissa | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
| 6 | ZHANG Sophie | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% | |
| 7 | HU Anna | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 8 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 9 | BIRNSTILL Reese | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 10 | BUSH Bethany | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
| 11 | CROOKS Riley | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | VINOKUR Anita | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% |
| 13 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% | |
| 14 | BROWN Aria | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | BORGUETA Madison | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | KIM Audrey | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | SCOTT Eve | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 18 | SHMULER Fiona | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | MCGRAW Sadie | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 20 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |
| 21 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% | |
| 22 | HUANG Doris | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 23 | LIM Alexa J. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | LIU Kelly | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | MACKAY Katherine | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | BAINS Nandini | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | KWON Ava | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 28 | MAK Kaitlin | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | BAIK Sarah | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | LI Sonia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 31 | ONG Lauren | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | PASUPULETI Laya | 11% | 38% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 34 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 35 | KANDADAI Lara | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | ZHAN Sophie | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 37 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 38 | KALISHMAN Anna | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LEOU Korina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 40 | PRESANTH Nandana | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 42 | WONG Charlene | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | STRIZHEVSKY Ariel | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | GUHA Surabhi | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | BARROSO Isabela | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 46 | CHI Claire | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 47 | LEE Kaitlin | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | GETZONI Mary | 50% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | ALAMI Amira | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | PARK Haylie | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | NEUMAN Ella | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 53 | ERBSEN Sarah | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | VATS Ishita | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 56 | GENTILE Vittoria | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 57 | NAYAK Antara | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | SIMMONS Kinley | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.