Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 64% |
| 2 | YANG Emma | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 3 | LI Eleanor | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% | |
| 5 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | - | 7% | 47% | 46% | |
| 6 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 7 | KIM Claire | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 2% | |
| 8 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 9 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 10 | FENG Audrey | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | DONG Angela | - | - | 1% | 10% | 52% | 37% | |
| 12 | JOO Natalie | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
| 13 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 14 | LIU Eva | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 15 | LI Katerina | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | HARRIS Julia | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 18 | MCFARLANE Asha | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 1% | |
| 19 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ORRINGER Lottie | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 21 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 5% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | LIN Yunong | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | CASTRO Sabine | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | KRAHE Annika | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 25 | SAKALLA Serene | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | CHEN Sophie | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | LI Savannah | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | TSE Isabel | 8% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | PARK-YOO Shia | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | LAZAR Carolina | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | HUANG Sophie | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 7% | 40% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | WAN Celine | 8% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | GREENLEAF Ella | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SHICK Veronika | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | NETTLETON Ava | 32% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | LUO Victoria | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Annie | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
| 40 | FANG Adela | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WANG Melissa | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | BRODY Coco | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 45 | MUNOZ Isabella | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.