University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
| 2 | LUO Miranda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 3 | CHAN Mila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | |
| 3 | LIU Ariana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 9% |
| 5 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
| 6 | THERON Zoe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 7 | NEUMANN Erika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 7% |
| 8 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 41% |
| 9 | LEE Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% |
| 10 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | |
| 11 | HSIAO Ariya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 2% |
| 12 | HOM Avery | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 7% |
| 13 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% |
| 14 | KIM Erin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 15 | CHAN Ella | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | 3% | |
| 16 | DING Madison | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 17 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | 7% | |
| 18 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | |
| 19 | MA Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
| 20 | LIU Isabelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | HSU Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% | |
| 22 | YU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 23% | |
| 23 | CHO Karis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | 2% |
| 24 | HOFFMAN Isabelle | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 25 | OTAEGI Elorri | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | TAN Shouyin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | ARYA Leela | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | TAI Taphanie | 100% | 75% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | LI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 5% |
| 30 | AHN Hayley | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | ZHANG Queeny | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MANANSALA Zara | 100% | 83% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | YU-TAN Claire | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | TANG Amelia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 35 | HO Chloe | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | BHANGOO Paloma | 100% | 54% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | DVOIRIS Maya | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | LEE Abigail | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 39 | KULKARNI myra | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SARANGAN Ovia | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | STERNAD Pia | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | HOFFMAN Amelia | 100% | 76% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | HSU Rachel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 44 | LIM Stella | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 81% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | PARK Seojeong | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | YU Xintong | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | HUGHES Bailey | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 49 | ZHAN Catherine | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | YANG Byanca | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | JOESUF Aurielle | 100% | 97% | 73% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | ARAKELYAN Marina | 100% | 100% | 87% | 43% | 7% | - | - |
| 53 | MARCHIEL Ava | 100% | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.