Carrollton, TX - Carrollton, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BRAR Sanjeet | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 2 | CHEONG Heonjae | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% |
| 3 | BONSELL Vance | 3% | 35% | 44% | 16% | 1% | |
| 3 | KIM Alexander M. | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% | |
| 5 | ZHOU Brian | - | 11% | 39% | 42% | 8% | |
| 6 | MENTA Varun | - | - | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% |
| 7 | CHON Taylor A. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 24% |
| 8 | MAGUIRE Matthew V. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 9 | GREEN IV James (Bud) | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 10 | BANNERMAN Andrew J. | - | - | 12% | 37% | 38% | 13% |
| 11 | HWANG Ryan C. | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 4% |
| 12 | CONINE Tanner C. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
| 13 | JUNG Junhwan | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 14 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 46% | 13% |
| 15 | YANG Ethan | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 5% |
| 16 | KOSURI Harsha | 3% | 29% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 17 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 18% | 2% |
| 18 | NGUYEN Andrew | 2% | 27% | 46% | 22% | 3% | |
| 19 | CHEN Christopher | - | 1% | 26% | 43% | 25% | 5% |
| 20 | ZHU Charlie | 8% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 21 | POLSER John | 31% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | SHEN Xuanlan | 7% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 23 | PAN Alex | 3% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 24 | BYBEE Matthew | 57% | 42% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 25 | LEWIS John G. | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | BOWMAN James | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | LI Matthew | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | XU Adler | 38% | 58% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | YE Joshua | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.