Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TINSLEY Cole | V V V V D | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
2 | MCGRATH Russell D. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
3 | CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
3 | DULISSE Alex | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
5 | HULSEY Logan | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
6 | LIU Wilbert | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
7 | LANGE Eric A. | D V V D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
8 | PRICE Makalyn W. | D V D D D D | V V V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
9 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | V V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
10 | FENG Kelly | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
11 | CUNNINGHAM Jr. John P. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
12 | PROCTER Jonathan R. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
13 | WEBSTER Davis G. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
14 | NORMAN Christian | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
16 | CHRONISTER Charles | V D D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
17 | PAK Matthew | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
18 | DREITZLER Nicholas | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | YANG Heng | D V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
20 | CORLEY Avery | V V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
21 | FLOYD Sean C. | V V V V D D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
22 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
23 | COOPER Judson | D V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
24 | HEINZE Luke H. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | JOSEPH William | V V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
26 | MARKS Luke | V D V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
27 | KELLEY Honor | V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
28 | BOBERTZ Hogan | V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | TENHOUSE Dylan | V D D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
31 | AMMON Blue | D V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
32 | KERTESZ Stefan | V D D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
34 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | V V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
35 | LEE Kennith | D V D D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
36 | SHAH Anuj | D D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | KOKA Ashwin | D V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
38 | JAAFAR Omar | V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
40 | PRICE Ethan | D D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
41 | GARTNER Kara | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
42 | MERRIMAN Morgan | D V D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
43 | GARTNER Kacie | V D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
45 | FREITAS Christina | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
46 | COOPER Tina M. | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
47 | CHUMNEY Ben | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
48 | MERMIGKAS John | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
51 | BASKIN Miles | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
52 | RICKMAN II Samuel B. | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
55 | COPELAND Raymond | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
56 | CUADRA Oscar | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
57 | WILSON Ashley | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
58 | MCCONNELL Leslie | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
59 | BURKE Kate | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
60 | TO Hang Minh | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.