UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% |
2 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 34% | 60% |
3 | BING Charlotte | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
3 | DONG Iris | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
5 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 35% | 17% |
6 | GE Lena Lan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
7 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
8 | POEI Lauren | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
9 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
10 | BOIKE Lucille | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
11 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
12 | WANG Annie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 7% |
13 | SINGH Evangelina | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
14 | WU Maggie Lei | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
15 | BLAKEY Heaven | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
16 | LI Savannah | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
17 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
18 | WATSON Evelyn | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
19 | JIANG Chloe | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
20 | OKWUOSAH Judith | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
21 | YU Eliza | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
22 | HUANG Natalie | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
23 | ALKADI Mai | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 1% |
24 | SWOPE Farren | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
25 | PUTHOFF Olivia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
26 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
27 | ADLER Zoe | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
28 | AADHI Hansika | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
29 | HU Sophie | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
30 | LIN Kenzie | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
31 | CHANG Olivia | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
32 | HARRIS Parker | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | DESERANNO Seren | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% |
34 | ZEE Savannah | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
35 | HOM Avery | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
36 | ZHOU Joi | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
37 | MORSE Katherine | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
38 | YIN Chloe | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
39 | LIU Ariana | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
40 | TAN Dorathy | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
41 | NWODO Naila | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
42 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
43 | DIRKES Catherine | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
44 | FRASER Morgan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
45 | STONE Sydney | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
46 | LEVY Gabrielle | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
47 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
48 | KNAPP Isabella | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
49 | MARTIN Sloan | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
50 | LEO Jenna | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
51 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
52 | MCDANIEL Laila | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
53 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
54 | SAMALA Reese | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | HUFFMAN Yunia | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
56 | RIVERA Leahy | 8% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 2% | - |
57 | LUO Amira | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
58 | NAFSOU Ava | 30% | 44% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
59 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 3% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
60 | FU Pui Lam (Paisley) | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
62 | ZHANG Caroline | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
63 | ESMONDE-WHITE Daphne | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
64 | LEIBERMAN Naomi | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
65 | NANU Ava | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
66 | LIN Claire | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
67 | KU Amanda | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.