Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | GROSS Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 2 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 3 | BARANOWSKI Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 3 | DANIELS Jonathan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 5 | CHAO Warren | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 6 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 9% | |
| 7 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 8 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 9 | BESKI Johnny J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 10 | SHULL Marc | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 11 | JAMES Lonnie M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 12 | DARRICAU Henri J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 13 | SALZER Scott | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 14 | MALLON Jeremy | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 15 | KRAMER Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 16 | ANDERSON Nathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 4% |
| 17 | GROSS Louis A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 18 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 19 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 88% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 20 | STAFURIK John (Jack) W. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 22 | WESTON Michael | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.