Georgia Tech CRC - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESHMUKH Parth S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 2 | KIM Alex T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 3 | STRICKLAND Michael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 3 | WANG Eric J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 5 | LIM Arthur A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 6 | CHU Jeremiah (Jeremy) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 7 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
| 8 | MUSSER Samuel I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 9 | KINNEY Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 14% |
| 10 | BENDER Rhys T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | COGSWELL Michael A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 13 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 12% | |
| 14 | JIANG Hannah S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | HUSSAIN Mustafa | 100% | 100% | 86% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
| 16 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 17 | MALLOY Patrick G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 18 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | WEBB Jacob T. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | CURTIS William K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | 3% | |
| 21 | BELL Kenneth-John J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | WAIDA Benjamin H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 22 | MCLAURIN Megan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 24 | POLK Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 25 | CHAPARRO Alejandra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 26 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | PANTALONE Giuseppe A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | MCGUIRE Gavin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | HAZEL Susan L. | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | AVVA Valerie E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 31 | JUNG Minche | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | DIAZ Ernesto A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 33 | WATKINS Christopher M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | MCAREAVEY James | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | COX Megan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | JOHNSON Nicholas | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | MURSHID M.M | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | HALL Myra C. | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | HWANG Katherine H. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | BUTFILOSKI Cooper B. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | MATHEW Esther | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | ANDRESS Joseph | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SORRELLS Brea | 100% | 89% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | MITCHELL Catherine L. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | VIVEROS Antonio | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | LEE David | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 50 | LIOTTA Madison | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | DAVIS Carter | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 52 | TANG Diana | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 53 | YOO Kristie | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.