Event Results
Tulsa Fencing Club InvitationalDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | POST Bentley | V V D V V | V V V | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 2 | TRAINER Liam | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SIGHT Ethan | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | BARTOLOMEY Jeremy | V D D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 5 | MORGAN Levi | V V V V D | D | 0.6 | 4 | +3.4 |
| 6 | POST Hudson | V V V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 7 | TANSKI Julia | D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 8 | BOLIN Jace | V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 9 | BOHN Drake | D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 10 | GUERRA Juan | D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 11 | YOHANAN Cyrus | D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 12 | ANDERSON Jessica | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |