Event Results
Tulsa Fencing Club InvitationalDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ARRINGTON Alexander | V V V V | V V | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 2 | SEWELL Mike | V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 3 | KELLEY Dessa | D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 3 | ZUMMER Ron | V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 5 | POST Hudson | D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |