Event Results
Tulsa Fencing Club InvitationalDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DODD Aj | D V V D | V V | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 2 | ARRINGTON Josephine | D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 3 | VOELKER Violet | V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 3 | POST Hudson | V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 5 | POST Bentley | D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |