Olympian Fencing Club - San Antonio, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZUBECK Dominic | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 36% | 6% | |
| 2 | FREIMAN Benjamin (Ben) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 23% |
| 3 | THAYER Jake T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 46% |
| 3 | SPIER Julian H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 5 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 36% | |
| 6 | KRAMER Jack P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
| 7 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% |
| 8 | HENTOSH Pierce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 37% | |
| 9 | THAYER Bryce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% |
| 10 | HURME Tommi K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 11 | FEINGERSCH Ariav (Ari) B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 12 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 30% | 4% |
| 13 | TIEMANN Landen | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 26% | |
| 15 | WOODALL Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 16 | CASTANO Helena | 100% | 100% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | YOUNG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
| 18 | LESCURE Dimitri | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | CARTER Tony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 10% |
| 20 | RAO Neil | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 5% |
| 22 | VINOTH Aaron | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | HAUSHEER Kuncen | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | YANG Zeph | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 25 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 26 | FLYNN Anthony L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
| 27 | GONZALEZ Michael | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 28 | KANASKAR Ila | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 30 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 31 | NGUYEN Bao | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | LU Haoyang | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | SOOS Whitman | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 34 | TAYLOR Liam F. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | YOU Joyce | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | WHITE Derrek W. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | THOMAS Joshua | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | KASKAN Peter E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 27% | 3% | - |
| 39 | RAGSDALE Jarrod | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | PATEL Avi S. | 100% | 87% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 41 | NANCE Hogan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 42 | GRIMSHAW Tim | 100% | 93% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | HORD Jacob | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 44 | SALAS Ryan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | LE Nathan | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | PEREZ Daniel | 100% | 92% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | TULLY Gage | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 48 | ROBINSON Jon M. | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | TIEMANN Aidan | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | ABAD Carlos | 100% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | COLARES BADKE TOCCHETTO Lucca | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 70% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | RASMUSSEN Eric | 100% | 88% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.