Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 2 | LEE Claire | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 3 | BAWA Jenya | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 3 | SEREGIN Katya | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 5 | AZMEH nour | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% | |
| 6 | HAN Yuchen | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 7 | KAUR Manroop | - | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 38% | 8% |
| 8 | BOROTKO Katerina | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | XIAO Nancy | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 10 | GOH Cayla | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 12 | MEYER Rachel | - | - | 3% | 24% | 45% | 25% | 3% |
| 13 | WU Michelle | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 14 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 15 | WANG Chloe | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | WONG Angelina | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SHEFFIELD Skye | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 18 | PETROFF Eva | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 19 | AI Amy | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 20 | PAN Angela | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 21 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
| 22 | LI Alice | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 23 | MEYER Rebecca | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHANG Jane | - | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 25 | WANG Trinity | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 34% |
| 26 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | DHAIYA Tanya | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 28 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 7% | |
| 29 | BRAGG Leah | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 6% | |
| 30 | FENG Iris | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 31 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 32 | SHETH Anayaà | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | LEE Claudia | 38% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | WU Madisen | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 36 | BI Michelle | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | CHEN Alina | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 38 | IVANUSHKINA Alisa | 23% | 48% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | KWON Elise | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | YAO Sophia | 10% | 39% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | CHOU Andrea | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | LEUNG Sydney | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WANG Selina | 2% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 44 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | STOCKTON Catherine | 26% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | TRIEU Autumn | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 46 | MONITTO Malina | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | BEJUGAMA Lasya | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | LIN Cynthia | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | LIN Chloe | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | HALL Henrietta | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | WROBEL Julia | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GARCIA Daniela | 32% | 47% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.