Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 29% |
| 2 | LIN Zhishan | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 3 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 3 | XING Melly | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 5 | BYK Karalina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 6 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 7 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
| 8 | MA'AT Isi | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | LUO lucy | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% |
| 10 | ELLISON Ingrid | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 11 | YARBILOVA Fasikhat | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 13 | CHEN Audrey | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | LEE Gretchen | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 15 | ZHANG Ziru | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | LAI Piper | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | JU Victoria | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 7% |
| 18 | MILLER Anna | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 20 | GOMEZ Amelia | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 21 | LIANG Jasmine | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | BAX Mila | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | HEMPHILL Mia | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 24 | KIRBY Emelie | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 25 | JIN Kerina | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | PAEK Ellie | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | LI Beatrice | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | CHAN Jaclyn | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | KIM Lael | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | GREENBERG Emily | - | < 1% | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% |
| 31 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | ZELDIN Nina | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 33 | LEE Annabel | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LE Minnie | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 35 | ST-LAURENT Zoé | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 36 | WU Caroline | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | WEST Mira | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CHEN qinying | 8% | 35% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Vanessa | - | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | DOMINIK Eliana | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 41 | CHEN Quianna | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 42 | CHIN Harper | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.