Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 2 | ECKERT Kevin M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 32% |
| 3 | QUINLAN Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 13% |
| 3 | SHONEMAN Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 28% | 3% |
| 5 | RITTERSHAUS Bryce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | |
| 6 | THOMPSON Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 7 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 8 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | SMITH Troy H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% | |
| 10 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | |
| 11 | PETERSEN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 12 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
| 13 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | HU Jansen T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 15 | MASSE Dean | 100% | 81% | 35% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 16 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 17 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 18 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | WALTING Paul J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% | |
| 20 | MASSE Jack | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | URBANOWICZ Mathias | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 24 | ERIKSEN Casey | 100% | 98% | 78% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 25 | SONG Changze | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 91% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | REINEKE Gerhard | 100% | 95% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | MULLARKEY Edward (Ed) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 21% | |
| 29 | YEE Charles E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | |
| 30 | EGHIAN Armen | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 31 | GU Eric | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | ZHOU Anping | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | HIGGINS Paul | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 34 | LIN ZICHEN | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 35 | BOWSER Jacob | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 36 | LONADIER Robert | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 37 | DAGLI Sai | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.