OLYMPIC FENCERS CLUB - Johns Creek, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh | - | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 2 | KULIKOWSKI Adam | - | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 3 | PAYNE Gareth | - | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 3 | LIN Kason | - | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 36% |
| 5 | NGUYEN Hubert | - | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 6 | ZHANG Eric | - | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 7 | HWANG Brandon | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 8 | ZHOU alex | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 9 | NGUYEN Audrey | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 10 | CUI Jack | - | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 11 | KUCIA Michael | - | 1% | 4% | 13% | 26% | 31% | 20% | 5% |
| 12 | JUNG Elliot | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | TAM Ethan | - | 2% | 9% | 21% | 30% | 25% | 11% | 2% |
| 14 | KWON Jason | - | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | WRIGHT Alex | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | PARK Andrew | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | JEONG Arisu | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 18 | FAN Yuchen | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 19 | REDDY Daksh | 3% | 16% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 20 | WEBB Jacob | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 21 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | ILENRE Roni | 7% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 11% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | BEDULLA Asher | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | KRIEGER Jack | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 25 | PATEL Krishiv | 1% | 5% | 16% | 29% | 29% | 16% | 5% | 1% |
| 25 | LEE Sean | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 27 | CHOI David | 2% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | PETE Landon | 2% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 29 | IYER Arjun | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | LIU Elinda | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | KIM Sangone | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 32 | HWANG Aidan | 1% | 5% | 16% | 28% | 28% | 16% | 5% | 1% |
| 33 | TAK Jemi | 4% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | ATON Dave | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 35 | TUCKER Evan | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | CHAVEZ Leontine | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | KHEGAY Martin | 6% | 55% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | JAIN Aadi | 14% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CHAMALA Satvik | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | GUNDUBOGULA Shrihan | 3% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.