Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TANG Owen S. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | QIAN Jason H. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | TIYA BIAYA K. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 5 | SHENG Dalton | V V V V V | V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 7 | YOON Junhyeok | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | PARRISH Evan | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | SAGE Michael P. | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | YAP Nathan | V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 11 | TANG Alexander L. | D D V V V | V | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 12 | VADEN Oliver | V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 13 | RAJ Jay | D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | ZHAO Adam | D D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 15 | DOELL Ethan | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 16 | ROSS III Paul D. | D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 17 | WONG Garrick G. | V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 18 | BOESKIN Nolan | V V V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | WANG Brayden | V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 20 | MARISI Gabriel | V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | MAO Lucas | D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | YANG Ethan J. | V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 23 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 24 | YOU Chanmin | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 25 | PAZ Luis | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 26 | DING Tommy | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 27 | MARTIRE Luca | D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 28 | SHAW Spencer | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 29 | CAO Kellen | D D D V D | V | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | MILLER Jonah | D V D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 31 | SU Daniel | D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | HARKINS Asher | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | CHIANG Aiden | D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 34 | MORTON Luke | D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 35 | BRIDGES Harrison | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 36 | SIGGINS Wally | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.