Crossroads College Preparatory School - St Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | HOWLAND Jonas | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
2 | STRINGER David | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
3 | HEYBOER Jason | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
3 | OZAWA Taishi | - | - | 5% | 25% | 49% | 21% |
5 | TWEMLOW Sacha | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 48% |
6 | VANOYEN Dominick | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
7 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 3% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - |
8 | LIU Yinhong | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 46% | 17% |
9 | MORALES Isaac | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 28% | 3% |
9 | TOEWS Jackson | 1% | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 1% |
11 | ZMUDA Aiden | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
12 | WENGER Liam | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
13 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
14 | LUM James | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
15 | BALES Gabriel | 2% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
16 | DEPP Edward | 2% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
17 | RYAN Nash | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
18 | MURPHY Jonathan | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
19 | KAGAN Noah | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
20 | BLACK John | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
21 | TAGORE Reyansh | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
22 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - |
23 | MA Gangjin | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
24 | HASTINGS Alex | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
25 | TURNER Jackson | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
26 | SEABLOOM Jack | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
27 | OSTFIELD Matteo | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
28 | YOUNG Jack | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
29 | KOPELMAN Henry | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
30 | PIANT Isaac | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.