University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Alisa | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
| 2 | FOELLMER Kristin | - | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 61% |
| 3 | CHI Chelsea | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 3 | YOU Emily | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 5 | GORDON Rachel A. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 6 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 7 | QIU Emily | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 46% |
| 9 | ASHER Valerie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 10 | ROVATI Caterina | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | VAZQUEZ-LOPEZ Veronica J. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 12 | ILYAS Ayah | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 13 | DIAZ Brenna | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 14 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 15 | DESAI Meera P. | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 50% | 13% |
| 16 | WEI Sherry | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 18 | SCHULTZ Gillian | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 20% | 2% |
| 19 | MCCOY Lauren | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | MURPHY Megan | 19% | 45% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | BARDIN Kira | 2% | 35% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | PILSON Rebecca | - | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 25 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | TEJADA Mikaela Aprille S. | - | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 28 | MUELLER Polo | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | PEELER Julia | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | GAVASHELI Margarita | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | JEYOON Lauren | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | WANDMACHER GUERRERO Angela | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | ROWLAND May | - | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 34 | MURPHY Katherine | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | LIU Sydney | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | BENAVIDES Samantha | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | STEEL Jane | 46% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | THOMAS Meagan R. | 6% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | GIFFORD Sally | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | JEANDHEUR Carole A. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | IYENGAR Sthuthi | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | EL BADAOUI Salma | 99% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.