Rockland Community College Eugine Levy Fieldhouse - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 2% | 16% | 48% | 35% | |
| 3 | CALISE Ella | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 3 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 49% |
| 5 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 6 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 7 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 8 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 9 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 10% | |
| 10 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 11 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 2% |
| 12 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 13 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 32% | |
| 14 | KAPRAN Anastasia | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 16 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 43% | 10% |
| 17 | FENG Grace | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 47% | 17% |
| 18 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 19 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 48% | 19% |
| 20 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 5% |
| 21 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 5% |
| 23 | HAO Danica | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | ROY Layla | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 25 | WANG Jasmine | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 5% | |
| 26 | HARRIS Julia | - | 3% | 30% | 47% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | WANG Amabel | - | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 28 | CHENG Isa | - | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WANG Yudi | - | 7% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 30 | JOO Natalie | 1% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | LI Han (Helina) | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | KIM Claire | 3% | 25% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | FIELD Julianna | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 35 | LIU Enjia sherry | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 36 | DIPAOLO Julia | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | GREEN Marisa | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 38 | WHELAN Amelia | - | 6% | 41% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 39 | NEUMAN Sophie | 5% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 41 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
| 42 | FENG Audrey | - | 9% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LEE Allison | 59% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Selena | - | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 45 | LI Savannah | 15% | 50% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SHENG Katherine | 2% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | WAN Celine | 47% | 47% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 1% | 35% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | SONG Jenna | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | REZA Fukaina | 6% | 53% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 44% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | GREENLEAF Ella | 3% | 36% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | HUANG Sophie | 21% | 47% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHOI Cara | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 39% | 52% | 9% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | CULLEN Alyssa | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | LAZAR Carolina | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | NETTLETON Ava | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | BERG Samara | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | LAU Victoria | 85% | 14% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.