Rockland Community College Eugine Levy Fieldhouse - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
2 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
3 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
3 | BADUSHOV Anton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
5 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
6 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
7 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
8 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
9 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
10 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
11 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
12 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
13 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
14 | WANG Weiyun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
15 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
16 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
18 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
19 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
20 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
21 | SAGE Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
22 | MUNJULURI ruhaan | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
23 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
24 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
25 | BAHK Caleb | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
26 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
27 | RIDKY Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
28 | AO Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
29 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
30 | LOO Jason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
31 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
32 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | - |
33 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% |
34 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
35 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
36 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
37 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
38 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
39 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
40 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
41 | JI Johnson | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
42 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
43 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
43 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
45 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
46 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
47 | BAI Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
48 | NADGIR Jaiden | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
49 | HO Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
50 | REILLY Xavier | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
51 | KRAYTMAN Matthew | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
52 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | JAIN Karanvir | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
54 | ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
55 | CHIEN Nolan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
56 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
57 | FLETCHER Logan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
58 | NIEBERGALL Jaxson | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
59 | ANSARI Umayr | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
60 | GAO Kai | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
61 | PATEL Kiran | 100% | 96% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.