Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SO Preston | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
| 2 | YOOK Isaac | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 3 | CHUNG Connor | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 3 | CHAMBERS Miles | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% |
| 5 | ZHANG Kaixuan | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% | |
| 6 | GONG Gavin | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 7 | LIU Victor | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 8 | BURGESS Beckham | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 5% | |
| 9 | WANG Alex | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 18% | 1% |
| 10 | FANG Eason | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 11 | YE Ivan | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 12 | XIA Matthew | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 13 | LIU Guanyu | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 14 | HU Harry | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 47% | 10% |
| 15 | LIU Aaron | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 16 | XIAO Brayden | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 17 | SLAVNOV Anton | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | YU BOWEN | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 48% | 18% |
| 19 | HENRY Cadel | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% | |
| 20 | TEDOFF Perlman B. | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | PAUL James | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | LYU Tyler | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | LORENZINI Samuel | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | BADMUS Joshua | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | LIU Ethan | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | ZHANG Aiden | 17% | 47% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | NAMBIAR Navin | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 28 | KAUL Ishaan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | RINALDI Savio | 1% | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | TSAO Alister | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | SONG Aidan | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 32 | YU Ian | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 33 | KIM Yusung | 2% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 34 | THEUNISSE Oliver | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | ROH Jaden | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | PAK Andrew | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | BRISENO Ethan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 38 | MANNINO Miller | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | KIM Samuel | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 40 | YAO Zachary | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | DULAY Peter | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | KOHLER Vaughn | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | PADANILAM Thomas | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | GORDON Ezekiel | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | BARRY Dave | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.