University of Tennessee HPER Building - Knoxville, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WOODLEY Colin | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | MUNLIN Donovan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | TOUSSAINT Semaj | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | BARTLETT Lauren | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | ZOOK Evan D. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | LEE Aaron | V V D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 8 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 9 | REYNOLDS Jay T. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | PETE Landon | V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 11 | DEMAREE Adam | V V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 13 | LIM Joshua | V V D D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 14 | WALLACE George | D D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 15 | CRAIG Alexander | V V V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | HAUSER Samuel | V D D D V D | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 17 | BEDWORTH Paige | V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 18 | DEEL Hayes | V V V V D D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | PAYNE John T. | V D V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | DONGES Anna | V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | EDWARDS Tim | D V V V D | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 22 | HAYES Zackery | D D V V V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 23 | TUCKER Evan | V D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | BABBITT Phoenix | D D V D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 25 | GILL Anhad | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 26 | BYRNSIDE Caleb | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | PUVALOWSKI Ryan | V D D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | KINDEL Amara | D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | PARKER Jordan | D D D V D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 30 | SEATON Jake | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 31 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | D D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 32 | PIERCE Marcia M. | D D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | SKAGGS Jacob | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 34 | PACK Josh | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 35 | BARRETT John | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 36 | SPAULDING Maleah | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 37 | PLANAS Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 38 | BULLER Chloe | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 39 | ADAMS Brianna | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.