University of Tennessee HPER Building - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | REYNOLDS Jay T. | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% | |
| 2 | PETE Landon | - | - | 8% | 39% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
| 3 | BYRNSIDE Caleb | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 3 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% | |
| 5 | CRAIG Alexander | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 27% | |
| 6 | BARTLETT Lauren | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% | |
| 7 | TUCKER Evan | - | 5% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 3% | |
| 8 | PUVALOWSKI Ryan | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 9 | DEMAREE Adam | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 10 | HARDISON Terry (Reno) | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 11 | LIETTE Charles | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
| 12 | HAYES Zackery | - | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | GILL Anhad | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | BARRETT John | 2% | 48% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | HAUSER Samuel | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | PIERCE Marcia M. | 7% | 27% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | BABBITT Phoenix | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
| 18 | PLANAS Ethan | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | PARKER Jordan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | SEATON Jake | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 21 | SPAULDING Maleah | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 22 | SKAGGS Jacob | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | LAGONA Anna | 1% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 24 | ADAMS Brianna | 7% | 41% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | BULLER Chloe | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.