New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HAHN Ever | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | |
| 2 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
| 3 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 13% |
| 3 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 5 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 6 | PARK Layne | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 7 | ZHAO Alexander | 100% | 93% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 8 | WANG Russell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | BURCH III Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 10 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 35% | 6% | |
| 11 | TERENTIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 12 | LEE Shane Gunn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | HU Simon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 14 | PARK Sean | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 15 | ZHANG Mark | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 16 | KETCHAM Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | O'KEEFE Brody | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 18 | ROMBERG Teddy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 5% | |
| 19 | SOLEJ Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 20 | KULJIEV Boyan | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | PASSMAN Julian | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 22 | MUSA Roman | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | |
| 23 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 24 | SUH Jordan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | HAMM Bennett | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 7% | |
| 26 | LANKA Gautham | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 26 | SABINO Bennett | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | FAZELINIA Erfaan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | THEETHIRA Kevin-Cariappa | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 30 | FRANTZ Ken | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | TIAN Alex | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 32 | ABADIR james | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | XU Jayden | 100% | 47% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 34 | CHUNG Hahnsooh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 35 | BARAKH Adam | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | HELMY Edward | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | FERNAINE Thomas | 100% | 68% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | GENTELA Pradyumna | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 39 | JOHN Christian | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.