New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FOSS Persephone | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 2 | KWON Ava | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | GONG Joy | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 3 | FUNG Iris | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 5 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
| 6 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 20% |
| 7 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 8 | MULLER Inara | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 9 | NANDA Maanika | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 10% |
| 10 | CHOWDHERY Myra | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 11 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 12 | STOLCKE Saskia | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 13 | LIANG Claire | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 14 | LEE Grace | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
| 15 | GOEL Lineysha | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 16 | CHAU Zoey | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | CASTELO Soleil | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 14% |
| 18 | SEO Kaitlyn | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | PASSMAN Caroline | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | ZHAO Selena | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 21 | KIM Eunjae | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | JOHN Sophia | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 23 | BAO Amelia | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | ZHANG Audrey | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | YAP Anna | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | YOUNG Sienna | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 28 | WANG Keira | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | HURÉ Maïa | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | GERALDINO Sofia | 1% | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | HAGLER Alice | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | SAGER Bianca | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | DIBADJ Ava | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | GU Allison | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 37 | FUNG Dylan | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | MADDISON Erica | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | MADDISON Estelle | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | GUAN Vivian | 10% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | PARAISO Isabella | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | SAXENA Devina Shyamli | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.