New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | - | - | 1% | 10% | 47% | 42% |
2 | KHANNA Adamantis | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
3 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
3 | BALE ATMAN | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
5 | CHAMBERS Miles | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
6 | KOZLOV Lucas | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
6 | DEELY Hartigan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
8 | HU Jayden | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
9 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
10 | SALDARINI Glenn | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
11 | SAGE Nikolai | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
12 | WONG Max | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
13 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
13 | LAMTAN Christoffer | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
15 | LIN Brendan | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
16 | ZHANG Ray | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
17 | JI Johnson | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
17 | CAMAYA Jordan | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
19 | CIEMINS Henry | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
20 | DE SIENA Salvatore | - | - | 1% | 14% | 51% | 34% |
21 | TRZEPLA Max | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
21 | LUCAS William | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
23 | AROUNA Ilan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
24 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
25 | ZWAKA Jonas | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | LEE Blake | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
27 | OREN Daniel | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
28 | GOMEZ Emilio | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
29 | MIAO Heqi | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
29 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
31 | KENNEDY Tomás | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
32 | WANG tiger | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
33 | ONUGHA II Emeka | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
34 | WU Vincent | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
35 | SUH Leo | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
36 | KETT Richard | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
37 | LEE Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
38 | MATTOO Dhruv | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
39 | SUN Stephen | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
40 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% |
41 | FIROOZI Sam | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - |
42 | LIEU Nicholas | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
43 | ARVIND Adhijay | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
44 | HAUSLER Jayden | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - |
45 | TASIKAS Peter | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
46 | BARENBOYM Michael | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
47 | NIEJADLIK Samuel | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
48 | CHANG Timothy | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
48 | MENZIES Liam | 10% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
50 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
51 | MERMEGAS Alexander | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
52 | REILLY Xavier | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
54 | ZARA Lucas | 11% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
55 | SONG Jerry | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
56 | FOUX Jonathan | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
56 | CHAVAN Aditya | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
56 | CHEN Vince | 36% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
59 | ZHOU Nicola | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
60 | ROMBERG Sam | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
61 | YAO John | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
62 | CHAN Ewan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
63 | SAYAR Luke | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
64 | LVOFF Leo | 3% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% | - |
65 | VISH Manyu | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
66 | LEIGH Brayden | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | BONEVELLY Nikolas | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
68 | SINGH Ekam | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
68 | SIMEONIDIS Philippos | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
70 | ZHANG Simon | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
71 | SHAPIRO Leo | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
72 | BOSSEN Daniel | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.