Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BABIAC Julia | - | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
2 | OYMANN Renee Louisa | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 46% |
3 | SEMEL Liana M. | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
3 | SZANTAY Anna | - | - | 3% | 21% | 53% | 23% |
5 | FENG Audrey | 3% | 31% | 44% | 19% | 3% | < 1% |
6 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
7 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 3% | 22% | 60% | 14% |
8 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
9 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 1% | 24% | 74% |
10 | LI Shuang | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
11 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 47% | 6% |
12 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
13 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
14 | MEYER Claudia | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
15 | NEUMAN Sophie | 2% | 14% | 39% | 38% | 7% | - |
16 | LI Katerina | 6% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 2% | - |
17 | CHENG Isa | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
18 | LI Eleanor | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
19 | LEVY Avery | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 22% | 1% |
20 | LIU Kiki | 7% | 36% | 42% | 14% | 1% | - |
21 | FIELD Julianna | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
22 | HUNT Abigail S. | 1% | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
23 | MING YUE | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
24 | YANIV Liya | 9% | 39% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
25 | JACINTO Jenna R. | 4% | 34% | 45% | 16% | 1% | - |
26 | COMO Gabriella | 74% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
27 | HATZOGLU Isabella | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | DALBERG Meadow | 30% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
29 | VAROQUA Tala | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
30 | WANG Yilin | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.