Energy Sport Club - Niles, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 2 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% | |
| 3 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 3 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 5 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 6 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 10% | |
| 7 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 8 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 9% |
| 9 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 10 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 11 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 28% | |
| 12 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 13 | COOK Grant | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 44% | 8% | |
| 15 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% | |
| 16 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 11% |
| 17 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 18 | FRASER Rhys | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% | |
| 19 | DAVIS Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
| 21 | MENASCO Juliun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 2% |
| 22 | SYMMANK Callen | 100% | 98% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | HONG Derek | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 24 | LI Andy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 25 | GREULICH Nikolas | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 27 | DEPP Edward | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 28 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | EDWARDS Connor | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 30 | IBARRA Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | FEEHAN Conor | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 94% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | KNIBBE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 34 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | YOUNG Jack | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | DENG Albert | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ENCISO Simon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 39 | VARRE Rishi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 8% | |
| 40 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 97% | 71% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | OSTFIELD Matteo | 100% | 98% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 43 | MARTIN Wesley | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | BILLIET Greyson | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | WOJTALEWICZ Aiden | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 48 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 76% | 23% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | KWAN Victor | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | NOTHIAS Sebastien | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | WANG Freyr | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | CHAN William | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | YATES Graeme | 100% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | FLOOD Moe | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 57 | NG Gavin | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 58 | RITTER Nathan D. | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.