Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DEVORE Delphine P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 65% |
| 2 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 3 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
| 3 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 5 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 6 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
| 7 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 23% |
| 8 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 9 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | < 1% |
| 10 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 11 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 12 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 13 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
| 14 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 15 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 16 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 17 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 4% |
| 18 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% |
| 19 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 20 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 21 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 22 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 23 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 23 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 25 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 27 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | |
| 28 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 30 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 32 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 34 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 35 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 36 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
| 37 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 40 | MI Aileen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 41 | OH Ceana | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 43 | KLINE Melissa C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 45 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
| 46 | SUN Chloe | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | YANG Audrey | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 49 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 51 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 52 | FENG Grace | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 54 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 55 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | YANG Iris | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | YANG Emma | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 60 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 63 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 64 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 65 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 67 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 71 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 72 | ROY Layla | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | STRUGAR Steliana | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 76 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 81 | LEE Allison | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 82 | YU Jane | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 88% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 86 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 88 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.