Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 3 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 18% |
| 3 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 1% |
| 5 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 6 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 18% |
| 7 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% |
| 8 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 9 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 10 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 3% |
| 11 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
| 12 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 2% |
| 13 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 53% |
| 14 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 15 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 16 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
| 17 | BURKE Nora S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 18 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 31% |
| 19 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 33% |
| 20 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 21 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 22 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 24 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 25 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 12% | |
| 27 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
| 28 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 5% |
| 29 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 30 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% | 3% |
| 31 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 32 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
| 34 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | < 1% |
| 35 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 37 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 39 | LAURI Keira | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 41 | SAYLES Nina R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 4% |
| 42 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 43 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 46 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 47 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 49 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 50 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 50 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 53 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 54 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 54 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% | 2% |
| 56 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 87% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 59 | YANG Angelina LeLe | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | 3% | |
| 60 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 61 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 62 | MARTURANO Bridget H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 63 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 64 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 65 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 68 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 8% |
| 70 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 71 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 72 | YANG Lea | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 73 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 74 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 75 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
| 76 | XIONG Haojiao | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 77 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 78 | PABIAN Emilia | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 79 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 80 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 81 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 82 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 85 | FAVO Isabella | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 86 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 87 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 88 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 89 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 90 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 91 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 93 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 94 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 97 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 98 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 99 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 99 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 101 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 102 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 103 | WANG yining | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 104 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 105 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 106 | GRULICH Rayaana | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 107 | DHAR Layla | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 109 | HU Anna | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 110 | HU Michelle | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 111 | WANG Alice | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 112 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | BERMAN greta | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 114 | DANTULURI Shalini | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 116 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | YAM Danika | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.