Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MARTINEZ ELIZALDE Giselle | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 2 | CHIARELLI Elisabet | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% | |
| 3 | DEMING Clare L. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
| 3 | GRAJALES Emily K. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 5 | SIERRA Kate | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% | |
| 6 | DUNN Linda J. Dunn J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 7 | DUDNICK Shannon | 7% | 42% | 38% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 8 | YANG Jenny J. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 9 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 10 | AMBALONG Jody P. | 3% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 11 | DENNER Jasmina | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% | |
| 12 | THORNTON Eva | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 13 | ALTMAN Leigh | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
| 14 | ENOCHS Liz | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 13% | |
| 15 | KLEIN-BRADDOCK Kimberly K. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 16 | FOLEY Eileen | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 17 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | OISHI Yoko | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 19 | VANCE Beth S. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 20 | BENDER Jeannine M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 21 | KOSZYK Agnieszka | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 22 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% | |
| 23 | SCHLIENGER Katia | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | FEITLER Sarah | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | DUONG Esther | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 26 | OBLONSKY Natalia | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 16% | |
| 27 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 28 | WU Yik Chun | 14% | 45% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | KING Robin E. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | WEBB Maud | 36% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
| 32 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 1% | 18% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | KIM Nam Heui | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 35 | MARENTES Blanca E. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 36 | DAHL Naomi V. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 37 | GORDON Sharon | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | SUZUKI HAN Alisa | 70% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | DEGEN Anita L. | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | CHRISS Rhonda | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | CAISSE Michelle | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | VINOGOROVA Daria | 26% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.