South Hackensack, NJ - South Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BROWN Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 17% |
| 2 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
| 3 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 55% | 24% |
| 3 | EDGINGTON Grace | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% |
| 5 | BOIS Adele | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 6 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 7 | SCHMITT Alana P. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
| 8 | LEE Jacqueline S. | 4% | 36% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 9 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 10 | DARINGA Arianna | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 10 | CAPPELLO Lauren | - | - | - | 7% | 40% | 53% |
| 12 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 13 | YURT Leyla | - | 2% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 6% |
| 14 | OGDEN Kayla A. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 42% |
| 15 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 16 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 17 | KOO Samantha | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 18 | HORSLEY Asherah | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 19 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 4% | 25% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | 2% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 21 | FAY Zoe A. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 22 | ZHANG Judy | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 23 | NEIBART Fiona | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | 1% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 2% |
| 26 | KIM Catherine D. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 27 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | LOCKETT Audrey | - | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 5% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 30 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 13% | 41% | 37% | 8% | - | - |
| 31 | KOWALSKI Celina | 37% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | CHU Catherine G. | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | SHIH Christina | 1% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 14% | 45% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 35 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | YEPEZ Olivia R. | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | RODGERS Sally E. | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | FAUSTINO Emily | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | LUDDEN Cordelia | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 40 | WHEELER Kira | 19% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | YI Felicia | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 42 | SODANO Kylie | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.