Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
2 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 45% | 36% |
3 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
5 | LIN Audrey J. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 39% |
6 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
7 | TSUI Natalie | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
8 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% |
9 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
10 | FAVO Isabella | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
11 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
12 | XIAO julie | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 11% |
13 | JOHNSON Lydia | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
14 | GHAYALOD reya | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% | |
15 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
16 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
17 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 26% |
18 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
19 | LU Elaine | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
20 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
21 | SHI Cathleen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
22 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
23 | HUAI Delilah | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
24 | HUANG MADELINE | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
25 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
26 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% | |
27 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
28 | FESTA Carina | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
29 | MARYASH Samantha | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
30 | LU Amy | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
31 | MANN Sophia J. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
32 | KHAN Alissa | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | - |
33 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
34 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
35 | LIN Nicole | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
36 | KER Grace | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
37 | ATTIA Jasmine | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
38 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
39 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
40 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
41 | LIU Yifei | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
42 | LEE Hannah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
43 | WANG yining | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
44 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
45 | XIONG Haojiao | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
46 | LEE Sophia | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
47 | TSE Angelina | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
48 | DHAR Layla | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
49 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
50 | LIM Jaslene | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
51 | JUNG Irene | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
52 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
53 | WU Helen | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
54 | FANG Victoria W. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
55 | ZENG Sarah | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
56 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
57 | MAKLIN Sofia | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
58 | SPEARS Mya B | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
59 | FEIG Sela | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
60 | DONG Angel | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
61 | MUND Ruth | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
62 | CHAVAN Arya | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
63 | HU Anna | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
64 | KRASTEV Minna | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
65 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
66 | XU Emily T. | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | LI Amanda C. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
68 | BERMAN greta | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
69 | TONG Jessie | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
70 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
71 | ENIKEEVA Luibov | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
72 | SCOTT Eve | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
73 | PADANILAM Lily | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
74 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
74 | GAUTAM Sahana | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
76 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
77 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 1% | 11% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
77 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
79 | JEONG Katie | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
79 | SAYSON Andrea | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
81 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
82 | HUANG Rachael | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
83 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
84 | DANG Kelia | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
85 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
86 | ZOLLER Noelle | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
87 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
88 | LAURI Keira | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
89 | DANTULURI Shalini | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
90 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
91 | CAO Sophie | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
92 | YAM Danika | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
93 | LEOU Korina | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
94 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
95 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
96 | CHIANG Melissa | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
97 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
98 | HAN Emma | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
99 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
100 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
101 | GUGALA Hanna | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
102 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
103 | LIN Annika | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
104 | WANG Alice | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
104 | ZHENG Valentina | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
106 | DUDNICK Morgan | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
107 | YANG Lea | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
108 | LIU Sydney | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
109 | PABIAN Emilia | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
110 | GRULICH Rayaana | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
111 | CHEN Elaine | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
111 | BAINS Nandini | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
113 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
114 | DIECK Miranda P. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
115 | AWAD Royce | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
116 | DAI Olivia | 2% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
117 | HENRY Soraya S. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
118 | FENG Alicia G. | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
119 | SEAL Cameron I. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
120 | KIRBY Skye | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
121 | WEI JoyAnn | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
122 | SCHOEW Margot | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
123 | YAO Rainie | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
124 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
125 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
125 | LI YING CHU | 13% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
127 | MARGULIAN Maria | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
128 | ZHAI AMY | 21% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
129 | MANI Francesca B. | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
129 | WANG Jiayi | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
131 | LEE Lauren | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
131 | XIE Nora | 2% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
133 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
134 | BAIREDDY Maya | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.