Salt Palace Convention Center - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAI Dong-Ying | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 2 | JUNCO Carlos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
| 3 | GLOZMAN Pasha | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 3 | GAVILLI Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 11% |
| 5 | CHO Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% |
| 6 | DARRICAU Henri J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 7 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 9 | ZHAO Zhiyong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | 7% | - |
| 10 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% |
| 11 | LAWRENCE John W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 12 | GREEN Michael C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 18% | |
| 13 | TANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 29% | |
| 14 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | KISSINGFORD John F. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | BHATT Jay | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 17 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 57% | |
| 18 | VALENTINE Iain | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | POPOKH Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | 5% | |
| 20 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | LEBLANC Gerald (Jerry) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 8% |
| 22 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% | |
| 24 | WU Clarence C. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 8% | - | |
| 25 | BASARABA Greg | 100% | 93% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | MONSEFI Amir | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 27 | BALBOA Rolando M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 28 | BROWN Jason | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | BENNETT Philippe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 30 | GEARHART Andrew (Andy) R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | 2% | |
| 31 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | PENGELLY Neil | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | MCGINTY Eli G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | OKURA Ethan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 8% | - |
| 36 | ESTELL Oscar M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% |
| 37 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LEYLAND John | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | TOMASI John | 100% | 95% | 65% | 19% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | LOPEZ Reynaldo (REY) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 41 | BERGER Jamie | 100% | 96% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | ALLAN Peter L. | 100% | 94% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LESNIAK Chuck | 100% | 81% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | KRAUSS John W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 45 | STOY Patrick | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | WILBERT Matt | 100% | 85% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | CARTER Tony | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | DRAKE David L. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 7% | - | |
| 50 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 100% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 52 | KASKAN Peter E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 53 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHAO Pierre | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | YOO Terry S. | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | NEWELL Tim | 100% | 72% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | HILL David E. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | WEMPLE Charles | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.