Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 79% |
2 | QI Julieanne | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
3 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
3 | WU Michelle | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
5 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
6 | BISONO Valentina | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
7 | MONOVA Lilyana | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
8 | BOROTKO Katerina | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
9 | KUMAR Eva | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
10 | STEMPKOVSKA Dina | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
11 | WANG Chloe | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
12 | GANSER Nicole | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
13 | CHEN Alina | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
14 | WANG Cecilia | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
15 | LI Caroline | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
16 | LOBANOVA Varvara | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
17 | VOSKOV Olivia | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
18 | LI Alice | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
19 | DHAIYA Tanya | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
20 | HU Chloe | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
21 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 2% |
22 | ZHONG Evelyn | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
23 | KAUR Manroop | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 44% | 6% |
24 | LIN Cynthia | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
25 | YAO Chloe | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
26 | ZHANG Jane | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 2% |
27 | CHOU Andrea | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
28 | LI Nicole | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
30 | MOKRETSOV Leah | 11% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
31 | LEE Eden | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
32 | JU Jennifer | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
33 | NING Miranda | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
34 | WU Madisen | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
35 | SHABBIR Aiza | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | GRIGORYAN Amaliya | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
38 | NAPOLI Eleanor | 28% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
39 | JIANG chenxi | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
40 | ALLIEVI Simone | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | CHEN Allison | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
42 | FAYLAYEV Sofia | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
43 | XU Mulan | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
44 | YU Sara | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
45 | DEITZ Surabhi | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.