Miami University - Oxford, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 21% |
2 | GERACI Paul A. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
3 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
3 | AGUILAR Nicolas F. | - | 2% | 21% | 48% | 29% | |
5 | PRIJATEL John R. | - | 1% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 8% |
6 | HABEGGER Alexander | 1% | 43% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
7 | METZ Evan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
8 | KLINE R. Jay | - | 5% | 30% | 46% | 19% | |
9 | STOCK Olivia | 1% | 14% | 40% | 36% | 9% | |
10 | MAI Carl D. | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
11 | FAENOVA Alexandra | 26% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
12 | MUMFORD Josh | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
13 | SCHRETTER Jayden | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
14 | LIETTE Charles | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | |
15 | JONES Hope | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
16 | FARRALL Junie | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.