MT. SAC ATHLETICS COMPLEX EAST - Walnut, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | |
2 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
3 | WANG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
3 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
5 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
6 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
7 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | ||
8 | ZHAO Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
9 | LI Stephen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
10 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
11 | FU Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 2% | |
12 | WONG Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
13 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 2% | ||
14 | LIU Zihao | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
15 | PARK Sean | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
16 | GOMEZ Emmett | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | |
17 | LI Vance | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 5% | |
18 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | YI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% | |
20 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
21 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | ||
22 | HONG Eason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
23 | LI Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 7% | |
24 | TENG Eric | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
25 | YANG Rony | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
26 | PINCHUK Spencer | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
27 | LU Jayden | 100% | 98% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
28 | YANG XINRUI | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | ||
29 | YOON Ian | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
30 | WON Jacob | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | ||
31 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | |
32 | SHENG BEN | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
33 | LI Ethan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
34 | DUCOURNAU Enzo | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
35 | KOU Logan | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | HAO hardy | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
37 | YUN Mason | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
38 | YANG Kevin | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
39 | LEE Zeo | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
40 | TU William | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | IM Mason | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
42 | ZHAO Jonathan Li | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.