Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SONG Angela | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 26% |
| 2 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% |
| 3 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | SHEFFIELD Lake Mawu | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 5 | WELLS Tesla M. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 43% | 9% |
| 6 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
| 7 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% |
| 8 | CHOY LeeAnn | - | - | - | 7% | 41% | 52% |
| 9 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 54% | 24% |
| 10 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 11 | LI Fei | - | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% |
| 12 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 13 | FENG ge | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 10% |
| 14 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 15 | XIAO Nancy | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
| 16 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 3% |
| 17 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% |
| 18 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | SENYUVA Su | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 20 | WANG Yumin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 21 | RICHARDSON Meredith | - | 2% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 7% |
| 22 | AZMEH nour | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% |
| 23 | SEREGIN Katya | - | 10% | 39% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | TRAN Helena | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 25 | GIELEGHEM Klaire | 1% | 17% | 44% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 26 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 27% |
| 27 | KAUR Manroop | 1% | 10% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | FENG Iris | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LI Yixin Catherine | 19% | 45% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BI Michelle | 8% | 45% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ETZEL Rowan | 1% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | LAI Amanda | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 33 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 10% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CAVNAR Peyton | - | 4% | 26% | 45% | 23% | 3% |
| 35 | WESER Veronica U. | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 37% | 10% |
| 36 | LIN Victoria T. | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | MONOVA Lilyana | - | 7% | 31% | 45% | 17% | 1% |
| 37 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 12% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 2% | 20% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 40 | YU Eva | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 14% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SONG Charlotte | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 21% | 53% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | CANNING Charlotte | - | 1% | 14% | 41% | 40% | 4% |
| 46 | BRAVO ORTEGA Astrid | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 47 | CONNOLLY Natasha | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | DUNNE Jessica | 39% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | CHEN Jingyun | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | RALSTON Katherine | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | WANG Sophie Y. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LIN Cynthia | 36% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | CHEN Alicia | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 54 | BISEN Shivani S. | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | NGUYEN Celena | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | PAN Angela | 4% | 53% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 57 | MONITTO Malina | 90% | 10% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | TIBBETTS Lily | 53% | 39% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 60 | RASO Olivia | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.